Acoustic panel finish codes are how the factory finds the face you meant. "The warm beige" is not a code. HH01 is a code. XN6000-11 is a code. XM Coffee is a code. The screen colour next to any of those is a stand-in, not a scan of the cloth.
The catalog sorts the faces into four families: velvet, linen, straw, and leather. Velvet carries nine codes, linen five, straw three, leather four. That is twenty-one face codes. Behind the face, the acoustic felt has six codes of its own. A complete sample request names both, when you know both.
Velvet
Velvet is the largest family. The codes do not describe a colour in words. Don't translate HH27 into "taupe" on a purchase order and expect the factory to translate it back. Write HH27.
| Code | Family |
|---|---|
| HH27 | Velvet |
| HH60 | Velvet |
| HH54 | Velvet |
| HH65 | Velvet |
| HH46 | Velvet |
| HH45 | Velvet |
| HH84 | Velvet |
| HH52 | Velvet |
| HH01 | Velvet |
If you are comparing HH45 and HH46, put both codes on the sample request. One swatch will not settle the pair. The numbers sit next to each other. That does not mean the cloth does.
Linen
Linen codes share the prefix XN6000 and then a suffix. The suffix is the colour. XN6000 on its own is not a finish.
| Code | Family |
|---|---|
| XN6000-4 | Linen |
| XN6000-3 | Linen |
| XN6000-11 | Linen |
| XN6000-19 | Linen |
| XN6000-26 | Linen |
Straw
Straw is the short list. OF1175 and OF1175-4 are not the same code. The suffix changes the face. OF019018 sits between them as its own code, not as a note on the other two.
| Code | Family |
|---|---|
| OF1175 | Straw |
| OF019018 | Straw |
| OF1175-4 | Straw |
Leather
Leather is the family whose codes already contain a colour word. Use the full code. "Black" is not enough, because the code is XM Black. The same goes for beige, coffee, and grey.
| Code | Family |
|---|---|
| XM Black | Leather |
| XM Beige | Leather |
| XM Coffee | Leather |
| XM Grey | Leather |
Felt behind the face
The felt codes are FG005, FG001, FG004, FG010, FG002, and FG012. The catalog does not rename them as black, grey, or charcoal. If you need a particular felt, write the FG code. If you don't know it yet, say so. Don't invent a colour name and hope it maps.
| Code | What the catalog gives you |
|---|---|
| FG005 | Code only. No colour word. |
| FG001 | Code only. No colour word. |
| FG004 | Code only. No colour word. |
| FG010 | Code only. No colour word. |
| FG002 | Code only. No colour word. |
| FG012 | Code only. No colour word. |
You can see indicative swatches on the finishes page. Those blocks are there so the families are easy to scan. They are not measured colour. A monitor, a phone photo, and a north-facing room will each shift the same cloth. The sample is the check.
Where the catalog actually names a family
Most profile pages do not pin a code to one family. One page does. The SAP063 catalog page names linen, straw, and velvet. It does not name leather. So a leather enquiry against SAP063 is a question, not a match you can assume.
SAP064, SAP065, and SAP066 share SAP063's size row: 60.5 cm wide, 1.8 cm thick, 240 cm long. Sharing a size is not the same as sharing the finish sentence. The linen, straw, and velvet line is printed on the SAP063 page. For the other three codes, ask which families are available when you request the sample.
For every other profile, the sales team confirms the finish family at sample stage. That is the working rule. It is slower than guessing, and it is how you avoid a crate of the wrong cloth.
Write the request so the sample can answer it
A sample request that can be picked in the factory looks like this: profile code, finish code, felt code if you have one, and the room you are judging it in only as a note. "SAP063, XN6000-19, FG010, for a feature wall" can be found. "Something linen, not too yellow" cannot.
If you are choosing between families, order the candidates side by side. Velvet HH01 against linen XN6000-26 against leather XM Beige will not resolve itself in a paragraph. Put the codes on the sample request. Judge them in the light of the room, then send the winner with the size from the size guide.
The introduction states a sound absorption coefficient of 0.8, and page two of the catalog says flame retardant, innocuity, and reduce noise. None of those lines names a finish. The catalog does not say that every code was tested as a separate finish, and it does not say the cloth changes the figure.
What not to add
Don't convert a finish code into a fire grade, a toxicity claim, or a test report. The catalog's three words have no grade and no standard number beside them. Don't convert a screen swatch into a paint reference. And don't attach a customer name or a project photo that the catalog does not contain. The codes above are the whole finish list this guide is willing to print.
When the code is chosen, the fixing sequence is a separate note: six lines from the catalog, including one line written for the mirror. That sits in how to install the panels. The quote itself goes through the form, with the code written the way it appears in the table.
Count the tables before you send the request. Nine velvet, five linen, three straw, four leather. If a code is not in those four tables, this catalog did not print it as a finish. Felt works the same way: six FG codes, and no seventh.
The face codes and the felt codes come from the acoustic catalog. The 0.8 figure and the three words on page two come from the product introduction and that same catalog. Neither one attaches a finish code to a test report.
One more habit saves a round of samples. Pick the profile from the size row first, then the finish from this list, then the felt code if you have one. Leave the felt blank when you don't. A blank is easier to answer than a colour word the catalog never used.
If two people are choosing, send both codes rather than a compromise description. HH54 against HH65 is a pair you can request as samples. "A bit lighter than the hotel we saw" is a memory, and memories don't match cloth. Keep the room note if it helps you, and keep the code because it helps them.